
Appropriately for a film about the enduring legacy of formative experiences, Incendies  opens with one of its most striking sequences. Though we do not yet  know the context, the sight of tear-stained, blood-speckled children  held still by soldiers while their heads are shaved is an indelible one.  As their young faces convey a haunting combination of resignation and  fear, Radiohead’s mournful 'You and Whose Army?' beckons 'come on if you  think you can take us all on', pre-empting themes of animosity and  intolerance. Gradually, one child is singled out from the throng via a  close-up of his tattooed heel, the inked skin’s full, terrible meaning  yet to be learned. In slow motion, the camera moves to meet the boy’s  direct stare. His unflinching gaze appears confrontational and  accusatory, until we get close enough to register the moisture in his  eyes, signalling not only malignant hate, but a devastatingly deep  trauma.
The sequence segues to a record-filled office in Canada,  where the central plot is initiated by notary Jean Lebel (Rémy Girard),  entrusted with executing the recently-deceased Nawal Marwan’s (Lubna  Azabal) last will and testament. Nawal’s twin children Simon (Maxim  Gaudette) and Jeanne (Mélissa Désormeaux-Poulin) are cryptically  informed that their absent father is still living; furthermore, they  have an older brother they previously knew nothing about. Two letters,  addressed simply to ‘the son’ and ‘the father’, are presented to the  grieving siblings; only when they are delivered will Nawal consent to  burial. 'Childhood is a knife stuck in your throat,' their mother’s will  continues, 'It can’t be easily removed.' Again, it is only in  retrospect that the epitaph yields its full meaning.  
Director Denis Villeneuve, adapting (and paring down) Wajdi Mouawad’s three-and-a-half hour stage play, admits that Incendies took him out of his comfort zone. 'The hardest thing was working in a milieu outside my own,' Villeneuve explains in an interview with Sight & Sound. 'I’d been to the Middle East before, but I still felt like a total tourist… I think that’s why I approached the story from the angle of the family: like me, the twins are outsiders in this Arab culture.'[1]
 Their  journey to the unnamed Middle Eastern country where their mother grew up  is told non-chronologically, with scenes alternating between their  present-day investigation, and vignettes from Nawal’s tumultuous life.  At first, Jeanne and Simon’s discoveries precede their confirmatory  flashbacks; later, secrets are revealed first to the audience, and only  later to the twins, as the weight of their ancestry threatens to engulf  them.
Though the country in question is evidently Lebanon,  Villeneuve and Mouawad opt not to state so explicitly. Costa-Gavras  employed a similar strategic ambiguity in his 1969 Oscar-winner Z,  opening the film by stating 'Any similarity to actual events or persons  living or dead is not coincidental. It is DELIBERATE.' Though  manifestly a dramatisation of Grigoris Lambrakis’ assassination, the  decision to avoid any categorical confirmation arguably broadened Z’s referential range, and, by extension, its political impact. Gavras utilised the technique again in State of Siege (1972) and Missing  (1982), which obliquely depicted the 1970 kidnapping of Dan Mitrione in  Uruguay, and the disappearance of an American journalist in Pinochet’s  Chile respectively. Stamping either with a precise setting, Gavras  argued, would render the subject matter local and historical, divorcing  it from the here and now of the audience whom he hoped to enlighten and  inspire.[2]
In the case of Incendies, the ciphered setting  seems less politically motivated, instead indicating the film’s  emotional, rather than intellectual, ambitions. To quote from another  Radiohead song to feature on the soundtrack, 'while you were making  pretty speeches, I’m being cut to shreds': it is not the angry rhetoric  of the pulpit, courtroom or government chamber that gives Incendies  its formidable power, but the arousal of empathy; not the persuasion of  politics, but the immediate, visceral horror of murder, rape and  torture. The abstraction also allows Villeneuve to allude to a complex  history without risk of lecturing or polemic. By not subjecting the  Lebanese civil war to direct analysis, he cannot be accused of failing  to parse its vicissitudes. Instead, the film can be emphatically  commended for its emotional resonances, of which little can be said here  without spoiling the impact of the film’s carefully-ordered succession  of grim revelations.
Incendies’ non-linear examination  of history’s oppressive residue recalls the work of fellow Canadian Atom  Egoyan – like Mouawad, an émigré from the Middle East. For example,  Ararat (2002) probed similar themes of diasporic identity and traumatic  heritage, and though Incendies’ core trauma is a more intimate  event, on a smaller scale than the Armenian genocide, it is no less  brutal and upsetting. To return to 'You and Whose Army?' (as the film  itself does on multiple occasions), Thom Yorke’s weary admonition 'you  forget so easily' has, by the close, been firmly corrected. For those  exposed to a war in which buses are torched with their passengers still  screaming inside; where orphanages are destroyed and their inhabitants  trained to kill; where rape is used as a weapon against prisoners – for  the victims, witnesses and perpetrators of such a war, there is no  forgetting; nor for the subsequent generation left to contend with  wounds both physical and psychological. Instead, the best that can be  hoped for is understanding. As one character notes, 'Death is never the  end of the story; it always leaves tracks.'
Christopher Buckle
Researcher and freelance writer
University of Glasgow
July 2011
[1] Tom Dawson (2011) ‘Blood Lines: Denis Villeneuve on Incendies’ Sight and Sound, accessed 27 June 2011. http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/featuresandinterviews/interviews/incendies-denis-villeneuve.php
[2] Constantin Gavras ‘Missing’ (1984) in Dan Georgakas and Lenny Rubenstein (eds.) Art, Politics, Cinema: The Cineaste Interviews (Pluto Press, London) p. 392
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment